ShmoopTube

00:05

Okay Ap englanders last one of this section The author's

00:09

attitude toward the theory of social darwinism can best be

00:11

described as what No Well there's a noticeable absence of

00:18

value judgments here The author doesn't say that twins contemporaries

00:22

disagreed with his stupid characterization of the period or that

00:26

immoral heartless social Darwinists argued this in that that's more

00:30

of a style of a history textbook rather than an

00:32

op ad That's what this is Well after the second

00:35

sentence the author mimics the voice of the social darwinist

00:37

to explain what they believed though she does so without

00:40

any overt enthusiasm So really get rid of a or

00:43

appreciation get rid of e Such a like exclamation points

00:47

Are parents medical aside like right on baby like why

00:50

she doesn't editorialized Get rid of b or punch holes

00:52

in their ideas Get rid of d This author ruffles

00:55

No feathers whatsoever Basically worst reality tv show ever So

01:00

the right answer here it's neutral She's basically a journalist 00:01:03.584 --> [endTime] and she has no opinion one way or another

Full Transcript