ShmoopTube

00:00

Yeah Oh Okay CT expires Next up There are three

00:08

ways Which of the following would best convince scientist to

00:22

to reexamine scientists One's work I went to the fund

00:26

Welling goes on a talk show and be good tells

00:28

a story about a tumor One example There Words published

00:31

in a peer review Mobile phone feels warm while talking

00:35

on There's a good one well work this published in

00:37

peer reviewed rights He will see right there Yeah has

00:41

way more scientific merit than work with just hopped on

00:45

a talk show or simply discussed in passing at the

00:48

water cooler Yeah peer reviewed articles Air Imp Horton because

00:51

other scientists can then check each other's work to make

00:54

sure the same scientific standards were followed Well this isn't

00:57

just a mean girls club where other scientists are excluded

01:00

because they aren't cool enough although we've been excluded from

01:03

plenty of those parties Way no this club has a

01:07

bunch of rules to make sure everyone is performing experiments

01:10

and collecting data properly anyway Scientists to specifically mentions that

01:14

science is one's work is unpublished and that that is

01:17

the main source for his claim that scientists one's evidence

01:20

is unconvincing What one's work might not be published because

01:25

it's biased and doesn't stand up to scientific scrutiny Yeah

01:29

well all right So just publish it Let the piers

01:31

review it and show us what you're hiding their side 00:01:34.4 --> [endTime] One No

Full Transcript